Arctic wetlands and biodiversity management: the fundamental role Indigenous Peoples play

Arctic wetlands support Indigenous culture and food security

Indigenous Peoples have significant ties to wetland protected areas in the Arctic, and understanding these ties is important for biodiversity management. “It is critical to understand how Indigenous communities use different water resources, the species that live there and what changes are occurring, because that allows us to get a read on biodiversity status and concerns,” says Buschman.

Arctic wetlands contain a number of species of flora and fauna that are important for Indigenous livelihoods and food security. According to the study, at least 83% of surveyed wetland protected areas support Indigenous subsistence activities. 74% of these areas are used for hunting, 66% for fishing, 46% for herding and 43% for gathering.

“Sámi reindeer herders rely on wetlands as places to migrate, pasture, rest, milk and calve their reindeer. This is one very obvious example in the European Arctic of how wetlands are critical to the longevity of Indigenous livelihoods and cultures,” said Buschman.

Despite the relationship between biodiversity and food security, wetlands conservation can actually be a driver of Arctic food insecurity. For example, sanctions against the subsistence of certain wildlife species that are locally important can create health, economic and cultural challenges in Arctic communities. The study notes that it is important to consider that biodiversity conservation can both support and inhibit Indigenous Peoples' food security. Managers need to work with communities to ensure that conservation efforts respect and accommodate Indigenous communities’ ability to continue their livelihoods.

^{Photo: Victoria Qutuuq Buschman}

Knowledge gaps in Indigenous wetland use inhibits biodiversity management

“There is a major gap in understanding how Indigenous communities use wetlands resources,” stated Buschman. Most wetlands management and conservation plans do not document Indigenous Peoples' resource use, leading to an incomplete picture of overall resource use and management within the areas.

“One of the problems is that management plans for protected areas often list the globally critical and endangered species and focus on those. These plans overlook the species that are more locally important or endangered, or the species that are critical to food security on a local scale,” said Buschman. “When management does not consider local contexts, it ignores the human dimensions of biodiversity conservation, and it ultimately is a disservice to our efforts.”

^{Photo: Victoria Qutuuq Buschman}

“Biodiversity is not just about keeping the number of species high and ensuring that none go extinct,” she added. “It is also about ensuring that the local patchwork of all the species, and the relationships that are there, remain as intact as possible under threat of climate change. If those relationships are not intact, we might see real problems 20 or 30 years from now."

"The wetland uses and knowledge that Indigenous communities have are really telling about what is happening on the ground. And communities should be more meaningfully engaged with the way that conservation targets and goals are structured.”

Indigenous engagement in wetlands management

While the study found that formal Indigenous representation in management processes occurs in one-third surveyed sites, it also found an appetite from Indigenous Peoples that want to do more. However, Buschman notes that there is a disconnect between Indigenous Peoples wanting to be involved in management and the space that is open for them to be part of that process.

“Indigenous communities are already doing a significant amount of work happening in the Arctic,” said Buschman. “Maybe not in the organization, but in the execution of managing protected areas, conducting research, establishing new protected areas and fighting for government funds to ensure that management programs can continue.”

She also offered some recommendations to improve the visibility of those efforts and for Indigenous Peoples to have their voice heard and make change.

“When people reach out to Indigenous communities they often look to elders with specific expertise or the Indigenous folks who have higher education degrees. But there are also plenty of Indigenous youth out there that have a lot of insight on what is happening on the land. People do not need to have a fancy education to be part of these processes and to contribute something meaningful. I would encourage opening more opportunity and funding for Indigenous communities and their community members to be part of these processes.”

“That said, it is also important that we open more opportunities for Indigenous youth to pursue the sciences. People do not realize the sacrifices that young Indigenous students have to make to achieve an education. For example, in Greenland, to get a degree in science, even at the bachelor’s degree level, you need to be committed to leaving the country. Improving the access and availability that Indigenous youth have to basic education without having to sacrifice their families, country or culture is really important."

"So, not only do we need to improve access to education, but we also need to accept that having a degree is not necessarily a qualification to be part of biodiversity management processes. Indigenous Peoples have voices and perspectives that are important to capture, and you do not need a sophisticated education for that.”

^{Photo: Victoria Qutuuq Buschman}

Suggestions for wetlands planning, research and management

The study identifies six suggestions that could improve the management and conservation of Arctic wetland protected areas in partnership with Indigenous Peoples, which can be found in more detail in the report.

1. Document Indigenous wetland resource use to allow management authorities to make decisions that respect and accommodate Indigenous resource use.

2. Develop protected area participation plans that specify cooperative objectives, participating entities and terms of evaluation.

3. Broaden wetland research priorities to further the goals of biodiversity conservation and Arctic food security.

4. Support community-based wetlands monitoring.

5. Connect beyond wetlands to explore the interactions between and beyond inland and coastal wetlands and examine opportunities between other CAFF projects to further facilitate research on Indigenous relationships with Arctic biodiversity.

6. Productively foster engagement in wetlands management by approaching Indigenous participation as an opportunity, seeking to build partnerships with Indigenous communities and engaging Indigenous leadership and communities at the beginning of the process.

“There is great potential for improving how we are engaging with Indigenous communities within wetlands resource use, management, and within protected area development and establishment,” said Buschman. “Simple consultation with Indigenous communities is not getting us where we want to go. Because of the remoteness of the Arctic, many researchers travel from afar, and a lot of the work and responsibility that is happening falls onto the communities. Conservation is a social process, and we need people to be invested and involved in the decisions and the execution of those decisions.”

The Arctic Wetlands and Indigenous Peoples Study is part of CAFF’s Resilience and Management of Arctic Wetlands initiative, co-led by Sweden and Iceland. This project aims to strengthen engagement on the roles and functions of wetlands as a resource to support sustainable development and resilience in the Arctic. The overall project goal is to use insights from scientific analysis to produce recommendations to support policy development and further develop management strategies to conserve biodiversity and ecosystem services that wetlands provide. Click here for more information.